0.12/0.12	% Problem    : Vampire---4.8_19852 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.12/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.12/0.33	% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 180
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Mon Jul  3 13:02:00 EDT 2023
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.19/0.46	Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hp42UTYq54/Vampire---4.8_19852
0.19/0.47	# Version: 3.1pre001-ho
0.19/0.54	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.19/0.54	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.19/0.54	# Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores
0.19/0.54	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.54	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.54	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.54	# full_lambda_9 with pid 20037 completed with status 0
0.19/0.54	# Result found by full_lambda_9
0.19/0.54	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.19/0.54	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.19/0.54	# Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores
0.19/0.54	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.54	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.54	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.54	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)
0.19/0.54	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-MHFFFFBN
0.19/0.54	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.19/0.54	# Starting new_ho_11 with 98s (1) cores
0.19/0.54	# new_ho_11 with pid 20038 completed with status 0
0.19/0.54	# Result found by new_ho_11
0.19/0.54	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.19/0.54	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.19/0.54	# Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores
0.19/0.54	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.54	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.54	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.54	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)
0.19/0.54	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-MHFFFFBN
0.19/0.54	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.19/0.54	# Starting new_ho_11 with 98s (1) cores
0.19/0.54	# Preprocessing time       : 0.006 s
0.19/0.54	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.19/0.54	
0.19/0.54	# Proof found!
0.19/0.54	# SZS status Theorem
0.19/0.54	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.19/0.54	thf(decl_28, type, descar2095969287nges_a: list_a > nat).
0.19/0.54	thf(decl_43, type, zero_zero_a: a).
0.19/0.54	thf(decl_46, type, append_a: list_a > list_a > list_a).
0.19/0.54	thf(decl_50, type, cons_a: a > list_a > list_a).
0.19/0.54	thf(decl_54, type, nil_a: list_a).
0.19/0.54	thf(decl_62, type, poly_a2: list_a > poly_a).
0.19/0.54	thf(decl_65, type, coeffs_a: poly_a > list_a).
0.19/0.54	thf(decl_74, type, g: poly_a).
0.19/0.54	thf(decl_77, type, ys: list_a).
0.19/0.54	thf(fact_6_sign__changes__coeff__sign__changes, axiom, ![X33:list_a, X1:poly_a]:((((descar2095969287nges_a @ X33)=(descar2095969287nges_a @ (coeffs_a @ X1)))<=((poly_a2 @ X33)=(X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hp42UTYq54/Vampire---4.8_19852', fact_6_sign__changes__coeff__sign__changes)).
0.19/0.54	thf(fact_66_Poly__snoc__zero, axiom, ![X160:list_a]:(((poly_a2 @ (append_a @ X160 @ (cons_a @ zero_zero_a @ nil_a)))=(poly_a2 @ X160))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hp42UTYq54/Vampire---4.8_19852', fact_66_Poly__snoc__zero)).
0.19/0.54	thf(fact_13_Poly__coeffs, axiom, ![X1:poly_a]:(((poly_a2 @ (coeffs_a @ X1))=(X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hp42UTYq54/Vampire---4.8_19852', fact_13_Poly__coeffs)).
0.19/0.54	thf(fact_7_ys__def, axiom, ((ys)=(append_a @ (coeffs_a @ g) @ (cons_a @ zero_zero_a @ nil_a))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hp42UTYq54/Vampire---4.8_19852', fact_7_ys__def)).
0.19/0.54	thf(conj_0, conjecture, ((descar2095969287nges_a @ ys)=(descar2095969287nges_a @ (coeffs_a @ g))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hp42UTYq54/Vampire---4.8_19852', conj_0)).
0.19/0.54	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X33:list_a, X1:poly_a]:((((poly_a2 @ X33)=(X1))=>((descar2095969287nges_a @ X33)=(descar2095969287nges_a @ (coeffs_a @ X1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_6_sign__changes__coeff__sign__changes])).
0.19/0.54	thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X1031:list_a, X1032:poly_a]:((((poly_a2 @ X1031)!=(X1032))|((descar2095969287nges_a @ X1031)=(descar2095969287nges_a @ (coeffs_a @ X1032))))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])).
0.19/0.54	thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X1461:list_a]:(((poly_a2 @ (append_a @ X1461 @ (cons_a @ zero_zero_a @ nil_a)))=(poly_a2 @ X1461))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_66_Poly__snoc__zero])).
0.19/0.54	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X1039:poly_a]:(((poly_a2 @ (coeffs_a @ X1039))=(X1039))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_13_Poly__coeffs])).
0.19/0.54	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X2:list_a, X1:poly_a]:((((descar2095969287nges_a @ X2)=(descar2095969287nges_a @ (coeffs_a @ X1)))|((poly_a2 @ X2)!=(X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.19/0.54	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X2:list_a]:(((poly_a2 @ (append_a @ X2 @ (cons_a @ zero_zero_a @ nil_a)))=(poly_a2 @ X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.19/0.54	thf(c_0_11, plain, ((ys)=(append_a @ (coeffs_a @ g) @ (cons_a @ zero_zero_a @ nil_a))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_7_ys__def])).
0.19/0.54	thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X1:poly_a]:(((poly_a2 @ (coeffs_a @ X1))=(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.19/0.54	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ((descar2095969287nges_a @ ys)!=(descar2095969287nges_a @ (coeffs_a @ g))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])).
0.19/0.54	thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X2:list_a]:(((descar2095969287nges_a @ (coeffs_a @ (poly_a2 @ X2)))=(descar2095969287nges_a @ X2))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.19/0.54	thf(c_0_15, plain, ((poly_a2 @ ys)=(g)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), c_0_12])).
0.19/0.54	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ((descar2095969287nges_a @ ys)!=(descar2095969287nges_a @ (coeffs_a @ g))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.19/0.54	thf(c_0_17, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_16]), ['proof']).
0.19/0.54	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.19/0.54	# Parsed axioms                        : 412
0.19/0.54	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 95
0.19/0.54	# Initial clauses                      : 532
0.19/0.54	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 34
0.19/0.54	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 498
0.19/0.54	# Processed clauses                    : 722
0.19/0.54	# ...of these trivial                  : 25
0.19/0.54	# ...subsumed                          : 121
0.19/0.54	# ...remaining for further processing  : 576
0.19/0.54	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 193
0.19/0.54	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.19/0.54	# Backward-subsumed                    : 2
0.19/0.54	# Backward-rewritten                   : 3
0.19/0.54	# Generated clauses                    : 754
0.19/0.54	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 396
0.19/0.54	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.19/0.54	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.19/0.54	# Paramodulations                      : 458
0.19/0.54	# Factorizations                       : 92
0.19/0.54	# NegExts                              : 0
0.19/0.54	# Equation resolutions                 : 206
0.19/0.54	# Total rewrite steps                  : 363
0.19/0.54	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.19/0.54	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.19/0.54	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.19/0.54	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.19/0.54	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.19/0.54	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.19/0.54	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.19/0.54	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.19/0.54	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.19/0.54	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.19/0.54	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.19/0.54	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.19/0.54	# Current number of processed clauses  : 179
0.19/0.54	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 71
0.19/0.54	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
0.19/0.54	#    Negative unit clauses             : 20
0.19/0.54	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 86
0.19/0.54	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 470
0.19/0.54	# ...number of literals in the above   : 1116
0.19/0.54	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.19/0.54	# Current number of archived clauses   : 309
0.19/0.54	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14663
0.19/0.54	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11660
0.19/0.54	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 79
0.19/0.54	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 338
0.19/0.54	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.19/0.54	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 49
0.19/0.54	# BW rewrite match successes           : 37
0.19/0.54	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.19/0.54	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.19/0.54	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 37222
0.19/0.54	
0.19/0.54	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.54	# User time                : 0.060 s
0.19/0.54	# System time              : 0.007 s
0.19/0.54	# Total time               : 0.067 s
0.19/0.54	# Maximum resident set size: 4020 pages
0.19/0.55	
0.19/0.55	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.55	# User time                : 0.069 s
0.19/0.55	# System time              : 0.011 s
0.19/0.55	# Total time               : 0.079 s
0.19/0.55	# Maximum resident set size: 2368 pages
0.19/0.55	% E---3.1 exiting
0.19/0.55	EOF